Provincial - Legal CAC Decision
On June 20th, the Lorval Developments Ltd. v. Langley (Township) Supreme Court of BC decision was released. Lorval sought ββ¦ to quash or set aside the CAC Policy or alternatively the June 10, 2024 amendment to the CAC Policy, for being beyond Langleyβs statutory authority (i.e. ultra vires).βΒ Β
The Hon. Justice Coval ruled in favour of Lorval, stating that ββ¦ the CAC Policy as a whole β¦ does represent a mandatory amenity payment regime in exchange for certain, specified rezonings. As a matter of law, such a regime cannot be imposed without the appropriate statutory authority which does not exist. The CAC Policy is therefore set aside as invalid.βΒ Β
UDI is still reviewing the case and its potential broader implications. In addition, the decision may be appealed. The case will be discussed at UDIβs annual Fall Tax & Legal Update.Β Β Β